<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sublime Text Editor Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stevecooper.org/2008/01/28/sublime-text-editor-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stevecooper.org/2008/01/28/sublime-text-editor-review/</link>
	<description>Programming, writing, programming about writing.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 19:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.stevecooper.org/2008/01/28/sublime-text-editor-review/#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 08:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevecooper.org/2008/01/28/sublime-text-editor-review/#comment-215</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi. Sublime also has a lot of textmate features -- it reuses the same language files and colour schemes. I've not had much experience of E, although I did see the website and watched the short demo video, and Sublime can do everything E did in the site.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For me, one of the main strengths is the developer, Jon. He's &lt;em&gt;very&lt;/em&gt; quick at turning around feature requests, often within a day or two for small tweaks. There's a nice (new) system for writing plugins, so it's turning out to be very flexible. Plus, there's no cygwin dependency.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Anyway, can't hurt to give it a go...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. Sublime also has a lot of textmate features &#8212; it reuses the same language files and colour schemes. I&#8217;ve not had much experience of E, although I did see the website and watched the short demo video, and Sublime can do everything E did in the site.</p>

<p>For me, one of the main strengths is the developer, Jon. He&#8217;s <em>very</em> quick at turning around feature requests, often within a day or two for small tweaks. There&#8217;s a nice (new) system for writing plugins, so it&#8217;s turning out to be very flexible. Plus, there&#8217;s no cygwin dependency.</p>

<p>Anyway, can&#8217;t hurt to give it a go&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gu</title>
		<link>http://www.stevecooper.org/2008/01/28/sublime-text-editor-review/#comment-213</link>
		<dc:creator>Gu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 00:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevecooper.org/2008/01/28/sublime-text-editor-review/#comment-213</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Sounds pretty good. I'm currently using E, a textmate clone. Something I start to hate about it is its Cygwin dependency. Anything E can do that Sublime can't?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds pretty good. I&#8217;m currently using E, a textmate clone. Something I start to hate about it is its Cygwin dependency. Anything E can do that Sublime can&#8217;t?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sublime Blog &#187; Wiki</title>
		<link>http://www.stevecooper.org/2008/01/28/sublime-text-editor-review/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>Sublime Blog &#187; Wiki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 06:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevecooper.org/2008/01/28/sublime-text-editor-review/#comment-195</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] also wrote a great review of Sublime Text, which you should go and read right now if you&#8217;ve yet to try Sublime.   Jon [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] also wrote a great review of Sublime Text, which you should go and read right now if you&#8217;ve yet to try Sublime.   Jon [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
